Physics Lab ExchangePhysics Lab Exchange
DiscussionsWorkshopsAbout
+ ContributeSign in

Labs

  • Find a Lab
  • Design a Lab
  • Implementation Tips
  • Assess Your Lab
  • Train Instructors

Community

  • Discussions
  • Contribute
  • Workshops

Help

  • Contact Us
  • My Account

About

  • About Us
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

© 2026 University of Washington Bothell, Cornell University, Alder Science Education Association. Funded by the National Science Foundation.

Back to Resources
Vetted

Electrostatics: Building Reasoning Through Observation and Inference

8 viewsAdded 2026-07-01Updated 2026-07-02v2: This is the latest version.

Overview

Summary

Students explore electrostatic charging hands-on, distinguish observation from inference, propose multiple charge arrangements, and design tests to evaluate competing explanations.

Description

In this introductory physics lab, students explore electrostatic phenomena using everyday and lab materials — rods, tape, balloons, cloth, pith balls, and electroscopes. The lab is structured in two parts. In Part I, students charge and uncharge various objects, develop an operational definition of "electrically charged," and learn to distinguish observations (what they perceive) from inferences (the charge arrangements they propose to explain those perceptions). A central requirement is that students propose multiple alternative arrangements of charge consistent with their observations, reinforcing that a single observation rarely determines a unique explanation. In Part II, students choose from four challenge options: charging metal objects, classifying conductors and insulators, explaining instructor demonstrations (e.g., can roller, water bender), or quantitatively measuring charge. Throughout, students document their reasoning in lab notebooks with diagrams and photos, give and receive peer feedback on charge diagrams, and present evidence-based arguments. The lab emphasizes collaborative teamwork with rotating roles and cross-team credit.

Student Learning Objectives

  • Use the electrostatic model to predict and explain electrostatic observations by proposing arrangements of electrostatic charge.
  • If proposed arrangements of electrostatic charge are not aligned with the electrostatic model and/or the observations:
    • Determine plausible explanations for the disagreement (e.g., assumptions or approximations in the models, measurement mistakes, or issues with equipment).
    • Test whether the results are repeatable or reproducible under the same conditions.
    • Design new experiments/tests to explore other explanations for the disagreement.
  • Share experimentation responsibility with other group members (i.e., rotate roles, allow others to lead)
  • Credit students in other teams for their contributions to experiments
  • Describe all methods, decisions, data, and findings in a lab notebook including justifications for all decisions made
  • Present conclusions, claims, and outcomes as arguments that are supported by and follow coherently from evidence

Lab Profile

Experimentation Goals

These experimentation goals are most strongly represented in the explicit learning goals described above:

Make and Use PredictionsRefine and Expand ProceduresKeep a Lab NotebookCollaborateDesign Procedures

Student Decision Making

In this lab, students have the opportunity to:

Design ProceduresRevise ModelChoose Research Question

Discovery

Determine results previously known to:

Instructors

Instructor Guide

Duration

1 session of 2 hours

Equipment Required

Everyday Items or Items From HomeBasic Physics Lab Equipment

Implementation Tips

The instructor pacing guide suggests 15 minutes for introductions and new team assignments, 45 minutes to reach the charge diagram stage (Part I through Q6, including peer feedback), 30 minutes for oppositely charging tapes (through Q9), and 30 minutes for Part II challenges. Students reaching Part II is treated as a stretch goal — if they don't get there, that's fine.


The lab includes several instructor demonstrations that can be mixed in as students work: can roller (charged rod pulling an empty soda can), water bender (charged rod deflecting a thin water stream), half-charged rod on a rotating stand with T and B tapes, electroscope charging by contact and induction, electro-flyer (charged mylar hovering over a charged plastic loop), pith ball charging and repulsion, and "The Force" (bringing an uncharged hand near a charged rod on a pivot). Not all need to be performed; choose based on time and available equipment.


Electroscopes have two touchpoints (top and bottom) with removable disc or sphere attachments — have students examine the electrical connections to understand what contacts what. The needle assembly is delicate; caution students to touch gently if at all.


For students who miss the session, a makeup version can be completed at home using everyday materials (plastic plates, containers, utensils, different cloths, wax paper, plastic wrap, foil, balloons). They complete Part I at home and do the Demonstration option using online videos of electrostatic effects. 

How This Fits in Your Course

This is Lab 4 in a 9-lab introductory physics sequence. It follows three circuits labs in which students build the circuit model (there is a flow of charges; more resistance reduces flow; more paths increase flow). This lab pivots from circuits to electrostatics, and the opening slides explicitly bridge the two: "Your electrical explorations so far" presents the circuit model alongside the electrostatic model introduced in lecture. Students should already know from lecture that there are two types of charge (positive and negative) and that like charges repel while opposite charges attract.


Following this lab, students complete two magnets labs (Labs 5–6), then transition to self-directed investigation labs (Labs 7–8) in which they formulate their own research questions, and conclude with a presentation lab (Lab 9). This lab also introduces the observation-versus-inference distinction and the practice of proposing multiple alternative explanations — reasoning habits that carry forward into the magnets labs and the self-directed investigations. Week 4 is also when new lab teams are assigned and midcourse feedback is collected.

Files & Links (4)

Download All
📄

2026-02 (Sp) Lab schedule.docx

12 KB

Lab schedule for the entire course.

Download
📄

Lab 4 Electrostatics - Observation and inference.docx

Hands-on Lab153 KB
Download
📄

Sp26 Lab 4 Electrostatics - Instructor.docx

Instructor Supplement337 KB
Download
📄

Sp26 Lab 4 Electrostatics - Sample.pptx

Lecture or Mini-lecture3.1 MB
Download

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your experience.

Authors

RS

Rachel Scherr

LB

Lauren Bauman

AM

Adrian Madsen

Physics Topics

Electricity and Magnetism

Course Level

Introductory

Student Population

Physics MajorsEngineering MajorsLife science MajorsOther STEM Majors

License

CC BY-NC-SA

Attribution, Non-Commercial, Share Alike. Others can share and adapt for non-commercial purposes, must attribute and share with the same license.

All Versions