Students test whether air resistance affects a tossed object's acceleration, using iterative experiment design, uncertainty analysis, and scientific integrity practices over two lab sessions.
In this two-week introductory physics lab sequence, student teams investigate whether air resistance significantly affects the acceleration of a vertically tossed or dropped object. Students compare two competing models—one in which air resistance is negligible (acceleration equals g throughout the trajectory) and one in which it is significant (acceleration differs on the way up versus the way down). Using sonic ranger sensors, students design pilot experiments in Week 1, then refine their methods and strengthen their evidence in Week 2, culminating in brief oral presentations to the class. Scientific integrity is woven throughout: students discuss responses to unexpected data, develop practical strategies for mitigating bias, and practice honest reporting of data, methods, sources, and interpretations. The lab emphasizes uncertainty quantification using the t-statistic for comparing data sets, iterative experimental design driven by data, and collaborative sense-making across groups. It is designed for introductory physics courses (BPHYS 117/121) and requires sonic ranger motion sensors. All materials include instructor guides with facilitation notes, scoring rubrics, student handouts, and sample/customizable slide decks.
Session 1 &2 Learning Goals:
Make predictions about expected measurements and use the predictions to check whether data make sense
When data and results do not come out as expected:
determine and test plausible explanations for the disagreement
test whether the results are reproducible under similar conditions
test whether the results are reproducible with improved precision
When data and results do come out as expected, test whether the results are reproducible with improved precision
Consider issues of scientific ethics when conducting experiments and analyzing data
Experimentation Goals
These experimentation goals are most strongly represented in the explicit learning goals described above:
Student Decision Making
In this lab, students have the opportunity to:
Discovery
Determine results previously known to:
Duration
2 sessions of 2 hours/session
Equipment Required
Implementation Tips
Students must commit to ONE object for the full two-week investigation — groups that switch objects mid-stream lose focus and fall behind. In Week 1, the primary goal is a working experiment, not polished results. Most experimental designs don't survive first contact with the equipment, so push students to complete and test their design and do a rough analysis of initial data before leaving. Week 2 is for refinement and rigor.
Sonic rangers have a detection cone with minimum and maximum range limits. Students need hands-on time learning to position the sensor (facing up or down) and keep the object's trajectory within the detectable zone. Budget time at the start of Week 1 for this.
A key facilitation challenge: likely neither the "air resistance negligible" nor the "air resistance significant" model will cleanly fit student data. Be prepared for this. A productive response is to have groups brainstorm testable variables (drag, buoyancy, air currents) and divide up who tests what across the class. The instructor guide provides detailed predictions for each variable to help you guide discussions.
How This Fits in Your Course
This is the fourth and fifth lab in a 9-lab introductory physics sequence. It follows a three-week pendulum unit (Labs 1–3) in which students learn to measure and quantify uncertainty, reduce uncertainty through iterative methods, and compare data sets using the t' statistic. Students should arrive at this lab already comfortable with repeated measurements, standard uncertainty, and the t' comparison framework.
The tossed objects unit shifts the emphasis from measurement technique to experimental design, model testing, and scientific integrity. Where the pendulum labs provided more structure, here students design their own procedures and choose their own analysis approaches. This makes it a natural bridge between guided and open-ended investigation.
The lab that follows (Lab 6: Stretchy Objects) introduces research question formulation, and Labs 7–8 are fully student-designed investigations that culminate in formal presentations in Lab 9. The tossed objects unit prepares students for that independence: they practice designing experiments, iterating on methods based on data, presenting findings informally, and proposing new testable questions — all skills they will need when running their own investigations. The follow-up homework for Week 2 explicitly asks students to propose questions for their own future investigation.
Students should have concurrent or prior exposure to basic kinematics concepts (position, velocity, acceleration), though the instructor notes indicate that force concepts (free-body diagrams) are just being introduced and should not be assumed.
2025-04 (Au) 117-121 lab schedule.docx
Other10 KBLab schedule for the entire course.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Rachel Scherr
Lauren Bauman
Adrian Madsen
CC BY-NC-SA
Attribution, Non-Commercial, Share Alike. Others can share and adapt for non-commercial purposes, must attribute and share with the same license.