Physics Lab ExchangePhysics Lab Exchange
DiscussionsWorkshopsAbout
+ ContributeSign in

Labs

  • Find a Lab
  • Design a Lab
  • Implementation Tips
  • Assess Your Lab
  • Train Instructors

Community

  • Discussions
  • Contribute
  • Workshops

Help

  • Contact Us
  • My Account

About

  • About Us
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

© 2026 University of Washington Bothell, Cornell University, Alder Science Education Association. Funded by the National Science Foundation.

Back to Resources
Vetted

Tossed Objects: Testing Models with Integrity and Uncertainty Analysis (2 parts)

17 viewsAdded 2026-07-01Updated 2026-07-23v5: This is the latest version.

Overview

Summary

Students test whether air resistance affects a tossed object's acceleration, using iterative experiment design, uncertainty analysis, and scientific integrity practices over two lab sessions.

Description

In this two-week introductory physics lab sequence, student teams investigate whether air resistance significantly affects the acceleration of a vertically tossed or dropped object. Students compare two competing models—one in which air resistance is negligible (acceleration equals g throughout the trajectory) and one in which it is significant (acceleration differs on the way up versus the way down). Using sonic ranger sensors, students design pilot experiments in Week 1, then refine their methods and strengthen their evidence in Week 2, culminating in brief oral presentations to the class. Scientific integrity is woven throughout: students discuss responses to unexpected data, develop practical strategies for mitigating bias, and practice honest reporting of data, methods, sources, and interpretations. The lab emphasizes uncertainty quantification using the t-statistic for comparing data sets, iterative experimental design driven by data, and collaborative sense-making across groups. It is designed for introductory physics courses (BPHYS 117/121) and requires sonic ranger motion sensors. All materials include instructor guides with facilitation notes, scoring rubrics, student handouts, and sample/customizable slide decks.

Student Learning Objectives

Session 1 &2 Learning Goals: 
  • Make predictions about expected measurements and use the predictions to check whether data make sense
  • When data and results do not come out as expected:
    • determine and test plausible explanations for the disagreement
    • test whether the results are reproducible under similar conditions
    • test whether the results are reproducible with improved precision

  • When data and results do come out as expected, test whether the results are reproducible with improved precision
  • Consider issues of scientific ethics when conducting experiments and analyzing data

Lab Profile

Experimentation Goals

These experimentation goals are most strongly represented in the explicit learning goals described above:

Make and Use PredictionsCompare Uncertain MeasurementsReduce UncertaintyRefine and Expand ProceduresMitigate Experimental BiasQuantify Uncertainty

Student Decision Making

In this lab, students have the opportunity to:

Design ProceduresDecide PrecisionDecide When Done

Discovery

Determine results previously known to:

No One

Instructor Guide

Duration

2 sessions of 2 hours/session

Equipment Required

Computers / SoftwareBasic Physics Lab Equipment

Implementation Tips

Students must commit to ONE object for the full two-week investigation — groups that switch objects mid-stream lose focus and fall behind. In Week 1, the primary goal is a working experiment, not polished results. Most experimental designs don't survive first contact with the equipment, so push students to complete and test their design and do a rough analysis of initial data before leaving. Week 2 is for refinement and rigor.


Sonic rangers have a detection cone with minimum and maximum range limits. Students need hands-on time learning to position the sensor (facing up or down) and keep the object's trajectory within the detectable zone. Budget time at the start of Week 1 for this.


A key facilitation challenge: likely neither the "air resistance negligible" nor the "air resistance significant" model will cleanly fit student data. Be prepared for this. A productive response is to have groups brainstorm testable variables (drag, buoyancy, air currents) and divide up who tests what across the class. The instructor guide provides detailed predictions for each variable to help you guide discussions.

How This Fits in Your Course

This is the fourth and fifth lab in a 9-lab introductory physics sequence. It follows a three-week pendulum unit (Labs 1–3) in which students learn to measure and quantify uncertainty, reduce uncertainty through iterative methods, and compare data sets using the t' statistic. Students should arrive at this lab already comfortable with repeated measurements, standard uncertainty, and the t' comparison framework.


The tossed objects unit shifts the emphasis from measurement technique to experimental design, model testing, and scientific integrity. Where the pendulum labs provided more structure, here students design their own procedures and choose their own analysis approaches. This makes it a natural bridge between guided and open-ended investigation.


The lab that follows (Lab 6: Stretchy Objects) introduces research question formulation, and Labs 7–8 are fully student-designed investigations that culminate in formal presentations in Lab 9. The tossed objects unit prepares students for that independence: they practice designing experiments, iterating on methods based on data, presenting findings informally, and proposing new testable questions — all skills they will need when running their own investigations. The follow-up homework for Week 2 explicitly asks students to propose questions for their own future investigation.


Students should have concurrent or prior exposure to basic kinematics concepts (position, velocity, acceleration), though the instructor notes indicate that force concepts (free-body diagrams) are just being introduced and should not be assumed.

Files & Links (7)

Download All
📄

2025-04 (Au) 117-121 lab schedule.docx

10 KB
Download
📄

Lab 4 Tossed objects - Scientific integrity.docx

Hands-on Lab151 KB

1st Session of the Lab

Download
📄

Lab 5 Tossed objects - Sharing findings.docx

Hands-on Lab150 KB

2nd Session of the Lab

Download
📄

Au25 Lab 4 Tossed objects - Instructor.docx

Instructor Supplement195 KB
Download
📄

Au25 Lab 5 Tossed objects - Instructor.docx

Instructor Supplement194 KB
Download
📄

Au25 Lab 4 Tossed objects - Sample.pptx

882 KB

Sample Slides for Session 1

Download
📄

Au25 Lab 5 Tossed objects - Sample.pptx

431 KB

Sample Slides for Session 2

Download

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your experience.

Authors

RS

Rachel Scherr

LB

Lauren Bauman

AM

Adrian Madsen

Physics Topics

Classical Mechanics

Course Level

Introductory

Student Population

Physics MajorsEngineering MajorsLife science MajorsOther STEM Majors

License

CC BY-NC-SA

Attribution, Non-Commercial, Share Alike. Others can share and adapt for non-commercial purposes, must attribute and share with the same license.

All Versions